A practical comparison for independent composers
LicenseTrack, PRO collection, or a rights team?
For Creative Commons composers, these routes do different jobs. LicenseTrack can suit composers who want a self-service path from reviewing a potential use to choosing a response. It complements PRO collection and does not guarantee that a use will be found, licensed, removed, or paid.
01
Recommended for self-service
LicenseTrack
A self-service monitoring-to-response workflow.
02
PRO registration/collection
Public-performance registration and collection within a PRO’s remit.
03
Major-label or rights-team representation
Representation and rights work defined by the agreement.
Detailed breakdown
Compare what matters
Scroll horizontally on smaller screens
| Capability | LicenseTrack | PRO registration/collection | Major-label or rights-team representation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monitoring and discovery | |||
| Monitoring approachLive coverage and scan timing depend on providers configured for the account and their schedules; results are not guaranteed immediately. | 24/7 autonomous monitoring. Live coverage depends on providers configured for your account and their scan schedules; results are not guaranteed immediately. | Registration and collection within the PRO’s remit; not general-purpose discovery of individual online uploads. | Any monitoring activity depends on the rights team’s mandate and the agreement. |
| How to interpret a possible useA potential match is a signal for review, not a decision about whether a licence was followed. | Review attribution, the exact Creative Commons licence, source evidence, and context before choosing what to do. | Registration is not a search for individual online uploads; repertoire and collection rules vary by PRO and territory. | A rights team assesses matters that fall within its representation scope and terms. |
| Licensing and response | |||
| Available next steps | After review, choose to make a licence offer or request a takedown. The composer makes that choice. | Supports public-performance registration and collection within its remit; it is not a general online-upload takedown workflow. | Licensing or enforcement authority depends on the rights and scope set out in the agreement. |
| Outcome certainty | A match, licence, payment, or takedown outcome is not guaranteed. | Eligibility and collection depend on repertoire, use, territory, and the PRO’s rules. | Services and outcomes depend on the representation terms and each case. |
| Royalty records and payout/accounting | |||
| Records and accounting | Keeps licence and royalty records for LicenseTrack deals; the composer share is 85% on eligible LicenseTrack licence deals. | Registration and statements relate to public-performance royalties covered by the PRO; reporting and collection rules vary. | Statements, splits, deductions, and accounting terms depend on the deal and territory. |
| Ownership and control | |||
| Who controls the composer’s rights? | LicenseTrack does not acquire the composer’s rights. The composer chooses whether to offer a licence or request a takedown after review. | The collection mandate and any rights terms depend on the relevant PRO rules and membership terms. | Granted rights and decision authority are specific to the representation or label agreement. |
| Best fit | |||
| Consider this route when… | You want a self-service workflow to surface potential uses, review evidence, and choose a licensing or takedown response, alongside any PRO membership. | You need registration and collection for eligible public performances within a PRO’s repertoire and territory. | You are seeking representation and are ready to assess a negotiated scope, rights mandate, and deal terms. |
See LicenseTrack plans
Review the current options for your catalogue and monitoring needs.